A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of your offense demands the most stringent punishment, looking at the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC delivers to the death penalty because the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender may be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and given that only the appellants were posted on the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[4]
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is set up along with the employee is found guilty after owing process of regulation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the assorted penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is just not adequate however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful method. Read more
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, website was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that's father in the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is really an eyewkness of the prevalence.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It requires the execution of the convicted person to be a consequence of their crime.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed in the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they'd almost nothing to worry about.